Show all posts by user

Request for new pole selection for new motors of direct drive. - 10 months ago

Good day. Could you please add 18 Pole Pairs (36) Poles to the options of motors to select in the setup menu? Goosky new RS4 is a (36) pole I have confirmed. Currently we only have 42 Pole closest to selection. Thank you if you can add this option asap to accommodate new model in market.

by OICU812 - Café

Re: Future Firmware to deal with EVO sensitivity issues? - 11 months ago

**Update** With the models I tested with hot glue modification I now have logged over 40 flights with zero issues. I have also been in steady communication with a few folks who had nitros that they deemed prior to modification as un-flyable, now all are working well and they are pleased. For the meanwhile there should be no intimidation to do this, as it simply does work. Thanks to the Mik

by OICU812 - Café

Re: Future Firmware to deal with EVO sensitivity issues? - 11 months ago

RV I have PM'd you with up to date email and contact info, also emailed you.

by OICU812 - Café

Re: Future Firmware to deal with EVO sensitivity issues? - 11 months ago

ulrich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dont get me wrong.. my last sentence is just my > personal opinion from a technical view. It is not > something new. I would love to get awarness on > this, since in my opinion a G load of 50g and more > ist not desirable in a heli, and with some care it > can be reduced by design. But thats a differe

by OICU812 - Café

Re: Future Firmware to deal with EVO sensitivity issues? - 11 months ago

ulrich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for your report! We are aware that there > are problems on Helis with very high vibration > load on the EVO. Our own samples are not affected, > so we only see whats reported from customers. > After some research in the last weeks, i was able > to resproduce similar effects on my beefed up >

by OICU812 - Café

Future Firmware to deal with EVO sensitivity issues? - 11 months ago

Uli, Eddie, Rainier I am positive by now you all know some people are struggling with issues as it pertains to the new sensors in the EVO FBL unit. Issue being how much more sensitive the sensor are in comparison to the NEO units. This has created negative chatter, and also people looking outside of their previous favourite choice of being Vbar. I have many friends globally who have been re

by OICU812 - Café

Re: swapping out a switch - 1 year ago

I do like the idea of a push button for rescue for certain, be nice one day if Mikado could source an option what would require no modification and simple swap out of the existing long tall switch.

by OICU812 - Café

Re: Notice of modification needed on Evo Touch announcement, need clarity - 1 year ago

RV Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Here we have a full PDF version containing all > required informations and hints as well as many > images and a step-by-step guide ;-) > > https://www.vstabi.info/sites/default/files/VBC_ev > o_fix.pdf Excellent! I noticed from the original bulletin to now this PDF it went from (6) spacers, to now (

by OICU812 - Café

Notice of modification needed on Evo Touch announcement, need clarity - 1 year ago

Seen the Mikado announcement as to some small spacers needed for main board on Evo Touch The message states washers 3 x 5 x 0.5mm in size. Most common washers in M3 are in fact 3 x 7 x 0.5mm is that a big deal? How critical is that outer diameter? Please confirm as many will have a harder time finding specifically the 3x5x0.5 while 3x7x0.5 are easy to find. Thanks,

by OICU812 - Café

Re: Evo vs Neo FBL: Mounting Tape Discussion and found differences - 1 year ago

ulrich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Well, its very hard to tell! I just recently > finished some Vibration testing on my vibration > test stand to get more insights. As for a general > summary, there is no real difference between NEOs > and EVOs Sensor. In fact i can find some > resonances of the sensing element, that may cause > so

by OICU812 - Café

Re: Evo vs Neo FBL: Mounting Tape Discussion and found differences - 1 year ago

Eddi E. aus G. Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi, > > to me it sounds perfectly reasonable that > different tapes make (even a huge?) a difference, > on different helis. > > Technically, as I understand, the stiffest > possible (!) connection to the airframe provides > the best results, between the sensors feeling the >

by OICU812 - Café

Re: Evo vs Neo FBL: Mounting Tape Discussion and found differences - 1 year ago

Vinger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I have tested the VBar Evo on all my Henseleit > helicopters and even on the TDRII which have some > of the stiffest frames and mechanics, and have had > zero issues with the supplied tape from Mikado. In > testing I have always started with the same setup > as the Neo and then progressively increased

by OICU812 - Café

Evo vs Neo FBL: Mounting Tape Discussion and found differences - 1 year ago

Ulrich, Rainier, Eddie, Now that more Evo units are hitting customers hands and helis I think this is important to bring up right now. As always I have my ear to ground across alot of forums, and I have also an Evo to and done some tests and some conversation to share with you. As you recall many years ago that when we used remote gyros connected to main mikado box (pre-silverline) we had

by OICU812 - Café

Re: Dreistellige Autotrimwerte mit dem EVO und 760 us-Servos - 1 year ago

Few people have tested seems some output adjustment might be in order on the evo as pulse showing under 650 even when 760us is selected, perhaps this is why the center is not the same between a GPB-1 box on HC futaba 760 servos and the evo for example.

by OICU812 - Café