start && end > -1) { if (start > -1) { var res = data.substring(start, end); start = res.indexOf('>') + 1; res = res.substring(start); if (res.length != 0) { eval(res); } } cursor = end + 1; } } } //]]>
How about if I currently have it set up as option (2), with the negative collective travel at 105%? I have perfect +12/-12 collective with 0-25-50-75-100 pitch curve on DX8 and "100" on the VBar collective. Is it worth the trouble to going back to option (1)? Would there be a performance advantage if I redo the setup as option (1)?von johnahamelv - Questions V5
Is there a best way to determine "hovering pitch"?von johnahamelv - Questions V5
How about if instead of lowering the high pitch collective travel (as was done in this case), I decide to lower the VBar collective range, and then increase the low pitch collective travel from -100% to -105% to get even +12°/-12° collective? Would this work too? Any detrimental effect from increasing the low pitch collective travel beyond -100%?von johnahamelv - Questions V5
The problem with sticking with option (1) which only involves adjusting the pitch curve on the DX8 is that the VBar Collective is set at "107" (ideal range 80-100). It I go with option (2), I can lower the VBar Collective to "100" which is within the ideal 80-100 range. The only problem with this 2nd option is that the low collective travel in the VBar graph would now be beyvon johnahamelv - Questions V5
With linear pitch curves in my DX8 (0-25-50-75-100), I am getting +13.2/-12.1. My two options of equalizing the collective range to get +12/-12 is to either: (1) Decrease the pitch curve on the DX8 to something like 0-25-50-74-96 or I can (2) Decrease the collective number in the Collective tab of the VBar so that I end up with +12* on high stick, and increase the low stick collective Tvon johnahamelv - Questions V5