Well - what is the advantage at the moment? - just the narrow pulse won't change anything. It will only make sense when we get more pulses (frequency) then too as well. But - lets do some Math ...
Consider you have rotor with 2000 1/min which means 33,33 1/sec.
Using 2 blades - we have 66,66 1/sec which is the maximum reachable control frequency here at one spot.
So - our 144hz are far enough, it also does not require a narrow pulse at all.
There is no benefit - except the numbers on the paper for marketing ;-)
regards (EN) / Gruss (DE)
Rainer Vetter
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Posting and answering - please use a PC and a standard keyboard. Answer all questions fully, take the needed time, don't forget probably requested attachments.
Für Posts und Antworten bitte einen PC und eine richtige Taststaur benutzen sowie alle Fragen vollständig abarbeiten. Nehmt Euch Zeit, beantwortet Rückfragen in Ruhe und vollständig.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Für Einzelkommunikation bitte ausschließlich Email verwenden! - PN, Messenger, Chat usw. werden nicht bearbeitet.
For single user communication please send a email only! PM, Messenger, Chat etc. won't be read.